![]() |
| Home | The AzTA | Transit News | Transit Resources | Legislative News | Search & FAQs | Contact Us |
| AzTA President's Message | APTA Weekly Updates | Press Releases | Transit News Stories | News Feeds |
|
View All 2006 Transit News Stories Guest Editorial-Jeff Meilbeck, Transportation Services Director, Coconino CountyPosted: May 23, 2006
Guest Editorial
Although drawing conclusions about voter sentiment is risky, taking a hard look at the facts of the failed transit tax campaign in preparation for the future is justified.
Fact # 2: Over the past 5 years Mountain Line service levels have tripled (10,000 hours to 33,000) and ridership levels have gone up 6-fold (100,000 riders to 600,000 riders). Mountain Line has high customer satisfaction scores, 95% on-time performance, and a relatively new fleet of vehicles. Fact # 3: Transit staff did not proactively forge relationships with tourism, business, advocacy and social service groups to explain the goals and strategies of the new transit plan. As Transportation Director, I did not provide adequate information on proposition 403 which would have allowed time and consideration for these critical community groups to form an official opinion and mobilize resources. Fact # 4: The 2006 campaign could best be characterized as non-existent. There were no highly visible champions from the public, private, or special interest sectors. No funds were raised in support of either a yes or no vote. No signs were printed, ads published, buttons produced, commercials run, or bumper stickers posted. Few additional resources were put into a public outreach effort. Connections were not made with voters. The value of public transportation was not made clear. Looking ahead to 2008 Flagstaff may want to consider successful campaigns from other cities. Over the past 14 months, 84% of transit ballots in the United States have been passed by voters. Many of these required a super-majority 66% positive vote. Common themes of successful campaigns include fund-raising and leadership from business interests, strong advocacy from respected elected officials, get out the vote efforts from quality of life advocacy groups, intense media analysis of pro and con perspectives, and extensive factual information created and distributed by local governments.
Perhaps most significantly, successful transit campaigns are based on diverse and sometimes opposing community players joining together on common ground issues. A diverse transit campaign forged on the shared goals of promoting individual and collective economic vitality, providing affordable mobility, and improving quality of life forms a solid basis for broad-based relationships. Similar to recent successful transit initiatives in Tucson and Phoenix, this collective approach allows public transportation issues to connect in a deep way with the Flagstaff community. A transit defeat in 2006 creates an opportunity in 2008.
Conclusions are risky, but I predict that the Mountain Line and VanGo transit systems have only just begun to establish themselves in Flagstaff and that the new Five Year Transit Plan will be carried by many in 2008. Until then, Mountain Line and VanGo will continue to provide the best possible service at the greatest possible value to the taxpayer.
|
|
View the photos from the AzTA events |
Download the forms you need |
Ask a question, browse the archives |
|
Privacy Policy | Site Map | Credits | Transit Jobs | Contact Us |
Copyright © 2005-2008 AZTA.org |